Concord has 12 hybrid vehicles and 2 more on order.
Concord uses bio-diesel. This renewable fuel displaces about 60,000 gallons or regular diesel per year. This helps to improve air quality and reduce dependence on foreign oil.
Concord Police use electric vehicles for parking enforcement.
Concord Police have transitioned to smaller, more fuel-efficient police cars, potentially saving about 25,000 gallons of fuel per year.
Concord has adopted a No-Idling Policy in 2005.

USGBC: World Citizen

Green building is a global movement, and USGBC has a growing commitment to ensuring our message has a global reach. Our international activities at Greenbuild and our expertise in policy, in technical green building issues, and in supporting the drive for a common carbon metric position us well to play a constructive role on the world stage in advancing the contributions of the built environment toward solving climate change.

As evidence of this commitment, this week, USGBC will join other green building councils and thought leaders from around the world in Copenhagen, Denmark, for the Conference of the Parties (COP15) United Nations Climate Change Conference. World leaders continue to struggle to find consensus around defining common goals and targets to address climate change, but during these critical meetings USGBC will aggressively add its voice to others who see greenhouse gas reductions from buildings as a fundamental strategy that should be addressed as part of the outcome of this round of talks.

Greenbuild 2009 – with its 27,373 attendees from 78 countries, hundreds of participants in the WorldGBC’s International Congress, and a dozen leaders of green building councils from every region of the world participating in the Opening Keynote & Celebration – underscored our international dedication. USGBC is committed to harnessing that energy and excitement with a focus on some clear international goals that will help us elevate the conversation.

One of those priorities is a common carbon metric. A fundamental aspect of tackling our carbon reduction goals is the ability to measure our progress, and to do that we need to have a common language worldwide. In November, the world’s leading green building organizations – including USGBC – reached a ground-breaking agreement to adopt a common global metric for the measurement of the carbon footprint of buildings. This is a critical and timely step that will demonstrate the cost-effective carbon mitigation potential of buildings, which account for around 40% of the world’s energy use and 33% of global greenhouse gas emissions. You can follow the events at Copenhagen by checking back regularly at the USGBC.org COP15 news page.

Essential to supporting the green building movement internationally is building capacity on the ground in local communities worldwide, providing professionals, policy makers and others with the tools and training they need to make green building a reality. Throughout 2009, the model by which USGBC develops, delivers and supports LEED and green building knowledge underwent a major evolution that will allow us to serve global as well as domestic audiences more effectively. We are working with green building councils and partners worldwide to bring our LEED curriculum to their communities. We will have increasing capacity to train green building professionals across the globe to serve as LEED instructors. Our course review process will allow us to identify and support quality green building education developed by third-party providers, including green building councils, international and multinational companies offering training for their employees, universities and formal education institutions, and others. We will offer education development services to help third-party providers create and improve their own green building curriculum. And we are committed to providing translations of select publications and courses, beginning with Spanish during 2010. Questions may be directed to the USGBC education department.

The USGBC community helps frame the global conversation about climate change mitigation, economic revitalization, and the other environmental and social challenges we face. We see that definitively in LEED’s increasing uptake in the world marketplace. At the end of the third quarter of 2009, there were 4,599 LEED APs outside of the United States. Currently, there are 2,688 non-U.S. green building projects registered or certified under LEED in 117 countries. Clearly, on the ground here and around the world, the pace of green building and the work of green building professionals underscore the immediacy and importance of the impact of green buildings.

By CHRIS KAHN
AP Energy Writer
Posted: Monday, Dec. 07, 2009

NEW YORK: Political, costly, and likely to choke off growth. That’s how the energy industry and companies that use a lot of energy describe the Environmental Protection Agency’s announcement Monday that greenhouse gas emissions are a danger and must be regulated.

Almost all energy and energy intense industries hope that Congress will step in with new climate laws, namely through a cap-and-trade system that limits greenhouse gas emissions while allowing companies to buy or sell emissions credits.

If not, companies say, jobs will be lost, an economic recovery will be hamstrung and everyone will pay more for energy.

Here’s what some are saying about the EPA announcement:

—

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Chamber President and CEO Thomas J. Donohue said EPA regulations could lead to “a top-down command-and-control regime that will choke off growth by adding new mandates to virtually every major construction and renovation project.”

“The devil will be in the details,” Donohue said.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce represents 3 million businesses and is dominated by small companies with 100 or fewer employees.

—

National Association of Manufacturers

Keith McCoy, Vice President of Energy and Resources Policy, said an EPA regulation on its own would make energy more expensive and force manufacturers to cut jobs.

“Unemployment is hovering at 10 percent and many manufacturers are struggling to stay in business,” McCoy said. “It is doubtful that the endangerment finding will achieve its stated goal, but it is certain to come at a huge cost to the economy.”

The National Association of Manufacturers represents about 11,000 companies worldwide.

—

The American Petroleum Institute

The main lobbying group for oil and gas companies called the EPA announcement a political maneuver, burnishing President Obama’s environmental record ahead of the Copenhagen climate summit. The Clean Air Act was not meant to regulate greenhouse gases, said API President Jack Gerard.

U.S. oil and natural gas companies spent $58 billion between 2000 and 2008 on technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, Gerard said. That’s “more than either the federal government or all other U.S.-based private industry combined,” he said.

API represents oil and natural gas companies, which supply more than 60 percent of the nation’s energy.

—

National Petrochemical & Refiners Association

President Charles T. Drevna also attacked the timing of the announcement, saying that the EPA based its decision on “selective science” that fails to account for the impact on the economy.

“It is hardly the time the risk the remainder of the U.S. industrial sector in an attempt to achieve a short-term international public relations victory,” Drevna said in a statement.

NPRA represents nearly all U.S. refiners and petrochemical companies that supply filling stations with gasoline and their products make up everything from diapers to auto parts.

—

Edison Electric Institute

EEI says that Congressional climate legislation could achieve the same results without wreaking economic harm to industries and consumers. Congressional climate bills include a cap-and-trade system that would allow utilities to ease into the carbon market, buying carbon allowances to help meet emissions targets.

In pending House and Senate bills, “emissions cuts are made where they are the cheapest. That can’t happen under the Clean Air Act,” EEI spokesman Dan Riedinger said.

EEI represents power companies that provide the majority of the electricity generated in the U.S.

—

National Mining Association

The main lobbying group for mining companies hasn’t stated a preference for EPA regulation or new federal laws that govern carbon emissions.

“There are clearly pitfalls with each approach, but we’ve never thought the Clean Air Act was well suited for a sweeping regulatory program that some envision,” association spokesman Luke Popovich said.

Coal mining companies provide the primary energy source for powering America’s electricity grid.

By DINA CAPPIELLO and H. JOSEF HEBERT
Associated Press Writer
Posted: Monday, Dec. 07, 2009

WASHINGTON The Environmental Protection Agency took a major step Monday toward regulating greenhouses gases, concluding that climate changing pollution threatens the public health and the environment.

The announcement came as the Obama administration looked to boost its arguments at an international climate conference that the United States is aggressively taking actions to combat global warming, even though Congress has yet to act on climate legislation. The conference opened Monday in Copenhagen.

The EPA said that the scientific evidence surrounding climate change clearly shows that greenhouse gases “threaten the public health and welfare of the American people” and that the pollutants – mainly carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels – should be regulated under the Clean Air Act.

“These long-overdue findings cement 2009’s place in history as the year when the United States government began addressing the challenge of greenhouse-gas pollution,” said EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson at news conference.

The action by the EPA, which has been anticipated for months, clearly was timed to add to the momentum toward some sort of agreement on climate change at the Copenhagen conference and try to push Congress to approve climate legislation.

“This is a clear message to Copenhagen of the Obama administration’s commitments to address global climate change,” said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., lead author of a climate bill before the Senate. “The message to Congress is crystal clear: get moving.”

Under a Supreme Court ruling, the so-called endangerment finding is needed before the EPA can regulate carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases released from automobiles, power plants, and factories under the federal Clean Air Act.

The EPA signaled last April that it was inclined to view heat-trapping pollution as a threat to public health and welfare and began to take public comments under a formal rulemaking. The action marked a reversal from the Bush administration, which had refused before leaving office to issue the finding, despite a conclusion by EPA scientists that it was warranted.

Business groups have strongly argued against tackling global warming through the Clean Air Act, saying it is less flexible and more costly than the cap-and-trade bill being considered before Congress. On Monday, some of those groups questioned the timing of the EPA’s announcement, calling it political.

“The implications of today’s action by EPA are far-reaching…individual Americans and consumers and businesses alike will be dramatically affected by this decision,” said Charles T. Drevna, the president of the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association. Drevna, in a statement, said “it is hardly the time to risk the remainder of the U.S. industrial sector in an attempt to achieve a short-term international public relations victory.”

Any regulations are also likely to spawn lawsuits and lengthy legal fights.

The EPA and the White House have said regulations on greenhouse gases will not be imminent even after an endangerment finding, saying that the administration would prefer that Congress act to limit such pollution through an economy-wide cap on carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.

Nevertheless, the EPA has begun the early stages of developing permit requirements on carbon dioxide pollution from large emitters such as power plants. The administration also has said it will set the first-ever greenhouse gas emissions standards for automobiles and raise fuel economy to 35 miles per gallon by 2016 to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.

The EPA’s readiness to tackle climate change is expected to give a boost to U.S. arguments at the climate conference opening in Copenhagen this week, where the United States offer a provisional target to reduce greenhouse gases.

While the House has approved climate legislation that would cut emissions by 17 percent by 2020 and about 80 percent by mid-century, the Senate has yet to take up the measure amid strong Republican opposition and reluctance by some centrist Democrats.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., lead author of the Senate bill, has argued that if Congress doesn’t act, the EPA will regulate greenhouse gas emissions. He has called EPA regulation a “blunt instrument” that would pose a bigger problem for industry than legislation crafted to mitigate some of the costs of shifting away from carbon emitting fossil fuels.

The way was opened for the EPA to use the Clean Air Act to cut climate-changing emissions by the Supreme Court in 2007, when the court declared that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are pollutants under the Act. But the court said the EPA must determine if these pollutants pose a danger to public health and welfare before it can regulate them.

You are invited to a presentation by the person Time Magazine called “one of the Western world’s most influential energy thinkers.”

AMORY LOVINS
Rocky Mountain Institute’s
Co-founder, Chairman
Chief Scientist

An experimental physicist educated at Harvard and Oxford, Lovins leads Rocky Mountain Institute, a market-oriented, entrepreneurial, nonprofit, nonpartisan “think-and-do tank.” He has lately led the redesign of more than $30 billion worth of facilities in 29 sectors for radical energy and resource efficiency.
Please join us for what promises to be an invigorating evening by registering on the link below or by calling the Center at 704-637-4294.

Thank you for your support of the Center and our events. We look forward to seeing you Feb. 23rd.

Sincerely,

Amanda Lanier
Coordinator or Programming and Operations
Center for the Environment at Catawba College
allanier@catawba.edu
704 637-4294

By Jim Morrill
jmorrill@charlotteobserver.com
Posted: Thursday, Nov. 19, 2009

Three Charlotte-area companies are among those that will benefit from more than $2.5 million in federal stimulus money coming to North Carolina to foster jobs in the so-called green economy, officials announced Wednesday.

The three are among 18 companies receiving nearly $1.4 million in stimulus grants announced by Gov. Bev Perdue.

And U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan, D-N.C., announced more than $1 million in grants. Most – $946,000 – will go to the state’s Employment Security Commission to collect and publicize information about green jobs.

Hagan said $100,000 will go to Telamon Corp., a Raleigh nonprofit, to train workers in green industries.

“The number one issue on everybody’s mind is jobs – jobs, jobs, jobs,” Hagan said in a conference call with reporters.

Meanwhile, Perdue, like Hagan a Democrat, announced grants of up to $100,000 to small N.C. companies to develop and market green and alternative energy technologies and products. They’re part of the third round of grants from the state Commerce Department’s Green Business Fund.

Among the recipients:

Haywood Landfill Gas LLC, Matthews: $100,000 to help develop a green energy facility in Haywood County that would convert landfill gas to energy.

SBM Solar Inc., Concord: $100,000 to help produce solar roofing for commercial and residential buildings.

SunQest Inc., Newton: $50,718 to help commercialize a solar thermal system to heat residential, building, pool and other medium-temperature applications.

Earlier, Hagan had announced other stimulus grants for green energy.

In October, Duke Energy and Raleigh’s Progress Energy each received $200 million to invest in a smart energy grid. And in August, Charlotte’s Celgard received a $49 million grant to produce components of next-generation lithium-ion batteries.

Big screens that gulp electricity spur first energy-efficiency rules for television makers.
By Samantha Young
Associated Press
Posted: Thursday, Nov. 19, 2009

SACRAMENTO, Calif. California regulators adopted the nation’s first energy-efficiency standards for televisions Wednesday in hopes of reducing electricity use at a time when millions of American households are switching to power-hungry, wide-view, flat-panel, high-definition sets.

The 5-0 vote by the California Energy Commission is just the latest effort by the state to secure its place in the forefront of the environmental movement.

California represents such a big consumer market that environmental groups hope the new standards will lead manufacturers to make energy-saving TVs for the rest of the nation, just as California’s stringent fuel standards for cars and trucks forced automakers to produce more efficient models for all of the U.S.

“Once again, California is leading the way, and we hope others will follow,” said Noah Horowitz, senior scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

The commission estimates that TVs account for about 10 percent of a home’s electricity use. The fear is that energy use will rise as people buy bigger, more elaborate TVs and put more of them in their homes.

The California regulations requiring televisions to be more efficient will be phased in beginning in 2011. The standards will become even tougher in 2013.

“We have every confidence this industry will be able to meet the rule and then some,” state Energy Commissioner Julia Levin said. “It will save consumers money, it will help protect public health, and it will spark innovation.”

Some manufacturers warned that the regulations will cripple innovation and limit consumer choice.

Maybe Silver, maybe Gold. But definitely LEED Certified! What used to be the old Cabarrus County Fairgrounds will now be a LEED certified Transit Center. Scheduled to be completed in summer of 2010. Some features include a vegetative roof, recylced building content (bricks), regional and/or natural materials (cork), high-efficiencey equipment, and maximum use of daylight for interior lighting. Molando-Holden was the winning bidder. Concord is moving in the way of energy efficiency as other similar projects are being announced. Stay tuned for these announcements!

Well not really. REALTORS are opposing provisions to the Waxman-Markey climate Change Bill. These provisions would make it mandatory for older buildings to provide energy retrofits, an energy label and a energy audit at the time of a transaction. HOLD UP! REALTORS are all for energy efficiency but forcing all properties to become energy efficient would not only add to all transaction costs but would stigmatize all older buldings. I think REALTORS efforts need to be in education and incentives to improve energy efficiency. Forcing change rarely works.

By Bruce Henderson
bhenderson@charlotteobserver.com
Posted: Thursday, Nov. 05, 2009

The N.C. Utilities Commission on Wednesday denied environmentalists’ move to stop the expansion of Duke Energy’s Cliffside coal-fired power plant west of Charlotte.

The N.C. Waste Awareness and Reduction Network had asked the commission to revoke its approval of the 800-megawatt expansion, called a certificate of public convenience and necessity, that was granted in 2007.

“The decision reaffirms that Cliffside is needed so we can continue to provide our customers” with electricity, said Duke spokesman Jason Walls.

With the ruling, the only remaining challenges to Cliffside are before a state administrative court. A federal lawsuit filed by environmental groups to stop or modify the expansion was dismissed earlier this year.

Before the utilities commission, WARN claimed that completing the project was no longer in the public interest. The need for the expansion, it said, is based on Duke’s potential sales of wholesale power, not the electricity demands of its Carolinas retail customers.

Duke argued that there was no legal basis to revoke the certificate. Despite slumping demand for electricity, it said, the Cliffside expansion is still needed.

The utility commission’s Public Staff, which advocates for customers, sided with Duke.

In denying the WARN motion Wednesday, the commission found there is a continued need for baseload power generation – the workhorse electricity producers such as coal-fired plants. It noted that Duke had already invested $1.1 billion, through 2008, of the $1.8 billion construction budget.

WARN executive director Jim Warren said the group has not decided whether to appeal.